<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Methods May Change But&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://practicingtheology.com/articles/the-methods-may-change-but/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://practicingtheology.com/articles/the-methods-may-change-but/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:08:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://practicingtheology.com/articles/the-methods-may-change-but/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicingtheology.com/?p=25#comment-12</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;The alarmist issue is one that I am trying to be cognizant of as well because it is easy for someone to misinterpret me as saying that technology is evil and bad which is not really what myself, you or anyone else is trying to convey. For me the hidden messages of technology are so important for us to understand, that in my excitement, I can sometimes come off as alarmist. As far as being hypocritical about using technology although we use it, that is something that I think we will never be able to overcome because no matter how much we say technology is not REALLY the problem, people will always see us that way. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The alarmist issue is one that I am trying to be cognizant of as well because it is easy for someone to misinterpret me as saying that technology is evil and bad which is not really what myself, you or anyone else is trying to convey. For me the hidden messages of technology are so important for us to understand, that in my excitement, I can sometimes come off as alarmist. As far as being hypocritical about using technology although we use it, that is something that I think we will never be able to overcome because no matter how much we say technology is not REALLY the problem, people will always see us that way. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Dyer</title>
		<link>http://practicingtheology.com/articles/the-methods-may-change-but/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>John Dyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://practicingtheology.com/?p=25#comment-11</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m lovin it. Here are two things I&#039;m trying to figure out: (1) how not to come across as alarmist, (2) how not to be hypocritical about technology usage (since I use a lot of it...).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lovin it. Here are two things I&#8217;m trying to figure out: (1) how not to come across as alarmist, (2) how not to be hypocritical about technology usage (since I use a lot of it&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

